Baanboard.com

Go Back   Baanboard.com > News

User login

Frontpage Sponsor

Main

Poll
How big is your Baan-DB (just Data AND Indexes)
0 - 200 GB
15%
200 - 500 GB
30%
500 - 800 GB
4%
800 - 1200 GB
9%
1200 - 1500 GB
9%
1500 - 2000 GB
13%
> 2000 GB
21%
Total votes: 47

Baanboard at LinkedIn


Reference Content

 
RSS Newsfeeds

Comic for February 23, 2019

Dilbert - 0 sec ago
Categories: Geek

Redis Changes Its Open Source License -- Again

Slashdot - February 23, 2019 - 10:45pm
Categories: Geek, Opinion

Researchers Make Coldest Quantum Gas of Molecules

Slashdot - February 23, 2019 - 10:45pm
Categories: Geek, Opinion

Google: Software is never going to be able to fix Spectre-type bugs

Ars Technica - February 23, 2019 - 6:30pm

Enlarge (credit: Aurich Lawson / Getty Images)

Researchers from Google investigating the scope and impact of the Spectre attack have published a paper asserting that Spectre-like vulnerabilities are likely to be a continued feature of processors and, further, that software-based techniques for protecting against them will impose a high performance cost. And whatever the cost, the researchers continue, the software will be inadequate—some Spectre flaws don't appear to have any effective software-based defense. As such, Spectre is going to be a continued feature of the computing landscape, with no straightforward resolution.

The discovery and development of the Meltdown and Spectre attacks was undoubtedly the big security story of 2018. First revealed last January, new variants and related discoveries were made throughout the rest of the year. Both attacks rely on discrepancies between the theoretical architectural behavior of a processor—the documented behavior that programmers depend on and write their programs against—and the real behavior of implementations.

Specifically, modern processors all perform speculative execution; they make assumptions about, for example, a value being read from memory or whether an if condition is true or false, and they allow their execution to run ahead based on these assumptions. If the assumptions are correct, the speculated results are kept; if it isn't, the speculated results are discarded and the processor redoes the calculation. Speculative execution is not an architectural feature of the processor; it's a feature of implementations, and so it's supposed to be entirely invisible to running programs. When the processor discards the bad speculation, it should be as if the speculation never even happened.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

A Philosopher Argues That an AI Can't Be an Artist

Slashdot - February 23, 2019 - 6:15pm
Categories: Geek, Opinion

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:05.


©2001-2018 - Baanboard.com - Baanforums.com