Baanboard.com

Go Back   Baanboard.com > News

User login

Frontpage Sponsor

Main

Poll
How big is your Baan-DB (just Data AND Indexes)
0 - 200 GB
19%
200 - 500 GB
28%
500 - 800 GB
2%
800 - 1200 GB
7%
1200 - 1500 GB
7%
1500 - 2000 GB
12%
> 2000 GB
24%
Total votes: 83

Baanboard at LinkedIn


Reference Content

 
RSS Newsfeeds

Could feathers inspire plane wing design and other news

BBC Technology News - January 24, 2020 - 9:43am
BBC Click's Paul Carter looks at some of the week's best technology stories.

Tinder to add panic button and anti-catfishing tech

BBC Technology News - January 24, 2020 - 5:52am
The move comes after criticism over the lack of safety features offered by dating apps.

TubeMate

ZDnet Blogs - January 24, 2020 - 2:46am
TubeMate YouTube Downloader enables you to quickly access, search, share, and download YouTube videos. Because downloading always happens...
Categories: Opinion

TubeMate 3

ZDnet Blogs - January 24, 2020 - 2:46am
TubeMate, a very popular video downloader, has been upgraded with all new design and great user experiences. Convenient right and left...
Categories: Opinion

What can you use instead of Google and Facebook?

BBC Technology News - January 24, 2020 - 1:31am
More and more companies are promising privacy online and an alternative to the big internet firms.

Sonos CEO says speakers will work 'as long as possible'

BBC Technology News - January 24, 2020 - 1:26am
The company said it was sorry for the confusion caused by plans to stop sending updates to legacy speakers.

Comic for January 23, 2020

Dilbert - January 24, 2020 - 12:59am
Categories: Geek

Mac users are getting bombarded by laughably unsophisticated malware

Ars Technica - January 23, 2020 - 11:20pm

Enlarge (credit: Kaspersky Lab)

Almost two years have passed since the appearance of Shlayer, a piece of Mac malware that gets installed by tricking targets into installing fake Adobe Flash updates. It usually does so after promising pirated videos, which are also fake. The lure may be trite and easy to spot, but Shlayer continues to be common—so much so that it’s the number one threat encountered by users of Kaspersky Labs’ antivirus programs for macOS.

Since Shlayer first came to light in February 2018, Kaspersky Lab researchers have collected almost 32,000 different variants and identified 143 separate domains operators have used to control infected machines. The malware accounts for 30 percent of all malicious detections generated by the Kaspersky Lab’s Mac AV products. Attacks are most common against US users, who account for 31 percent of attacks Kaspersky Lab sees. Germany, with 14 percent, and France and the UK (both with 10 percent) followed. For malware using such a crude and outdated infection method, Shlayer remains surprisingly prolific.

An analysis Kaspersky Lab published on Thursday says that Shlayer is “a rather ordinary piece of malware” that, except for a recent variant based on a Python script, was built on Bash commands. Under the hood, the workflow for all versions is similar: they collect IDs and system versions and, based on that information, download and execute a file. The download is then deleted to remote traces of an infection. Shlayer also uses curl with the combination of options -f0L, which Thursday’s post said “is basically the calling card of the entire family.”

Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Scientists Discover 'Why Stress Turns Hair White'

Slashdot - January 23, 2020 - 11:15pm
Categories: Geek, Opinion

Time check: Examining the Doomsday Clock’s move to 100 seconds to midnight

Ars Technica - January 23, 2020 - 10:58pm

Enlarge / The Doomsday Clock reads 100 seconds to midnight, a decision made by The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, during an announcement at the National Press Club in Washington, DC, on January 23, 2020. (credit: EVA HAMBACH/AFP via Getty Images)

Today, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists released a statement that the group's Science and Security Board had moved the hands on the symbolic Doomsday Clock forward by 20 seconds to 100 seconds before midnight. Since the advent of the Doomsday Clock—even in the peak years of the Cold War—the clock's minute hand has never before been advanced past the 11:58 mark.

In a statement on the change, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists President and CEO Rachel Bronson said:

As far as the Bulletin and the Doomsday Clock are concerned, the world has entered into the realm of the two-minute warning, a period when danger is high and the margin for error low. The moment demands attention and new, creative responses. If decision makers continue to fail to act—pretending that being inside two minutes is no more urgent than the preceding period—citizens around the world should rightfully echo the words of climate activist Greta Thunberg and ask: "How dare you?"

Before 2017, the clock had not been at that mark since 1953—the year in which the United States and the Soviet Union both conducted atmospheric tests of their first thermonuclear bombs. Even during the Reagan years—during which the world came the closest it had ever come to a nuclear war—the clock was advanced only as far as three minutes before midnight. And in the fictional world of the original Watchmen comic books, the clock never advanced past five minutes to midnight.

Read 13 remaining paragraphs | Comments

CenturyLink, Frontier took FCC cash, failed to deploy all required broadband

Ars Technica - January 23, 2020 - 10:21pm

Enlarge / A CenturyLink repair truck in Estes Park, Colorado, in 2018. (credit: Tony Webster / Flickr)

CenturyLink and Frontier Communications have apparently failed to meet broadband-deployment requirements in numerous states where they are receiving government funding to expand their networks in rural areas.

CenturyLink notified the Federal Communications Commission that it "may not have reached the deployment milestone" in 23 states and that it hit the latest deadline in only 10 states.

Frontier similarly notified the FCC that it "may not have met" the requirements in 13 states. Frontier met or exceeded the requirement in 16 other states.

Read 16 remaining paragraphs | Comments

EPA reasoning for gutting fuel-economy rule doesn’t hold up, senator finds

Ars Technica - January 23, 2020 - 10:08pm

Enlarge / Traffic moves through an interchange along Interstate 580 on July 25, 2019, in Oakland, California. (credit: Justin Sullivan | Getty Images)

The Trump administration has for several years been working to weaken federal vehicle fuel-efficiency standards. To justify these changes, regulatory agencies argued that more stringent standards would both cost consumers more and reduce road safety. A draft version of the new final rule, however, seems to directly contradict those lines of reasoning.

The draft of the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles rule has not been released publicly, but Sen. Thomas Carper (D-Del.) has seen it. In a letter (PDF) to the White House, Carper says not only is the rule "replete with numerous questionable legal, procedural, and technical assertions," as well as "apparent typographical and other errors," but it also completely fails to provide the safety or economic benefits initially claimed.

Why SAFE?

The SAFE rule is part of a back-and-forth that hasn't literally been going on since the dawn of time, but it kind of feels that way. The kerfuffle all began in 2012 when the Obama administration adopted a fuel-economy standard that would gradually increase the average miles-per-gallon rating for most cars to 54.5mpg by 2025 (about 40mpg under real-world conditions). The Environmental Protection Agency finalized that standard in December 2016.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:59.


©2001-2018 - Baanboard.com - Baanforums.com